MSTU5606

From Studyplace

Jump to: navigation, search
Communication Theory and Social Thought

Teachers College • Columbia University
MSTU5606 Navigator
Class Meetings Fall 2008 & Spring 2009:
Wednesdays, 3:00 to 4:40 p.m.
308 Lewisohn Hall
Bibliographic Resources
Useful Links
Course Participants
Course Glossary
Course FAQ
Course Suggestions

9/3 • 1  
9/10 • 2  
9/17 • 3  
9/24 • 4  
10/1 • 5  
10/8 • 6  
10/15 • 7  
10/22 • 8  
10/29 • 9  
11/5 • 10  
11/12 • 11  
11/19 • 12  
12/3 • 13  
12/10 • 14  
12/17 • 15  
1/21 • 16  
1/28 • 17  
2/4 • 18  
2/11 • 19  
2/18 • 20  
2/25 • 21  
3/4 • 22  
3/11 • 23  
3/25 • 24  
4/1 • 25  
4/8 • 26  
4/15 • 27  
4/22 • 128  
4/29 • 129  
5/6 • 130  

Introductory
Marx & Engels, 1844-1888
Emile Durkheim, 1893 & 95
Ferdinand Tönnies, 1887
Max Weber, c. 1910
Georg Simmel, 1903, 1904
Building a Course FAQ
W. E. B. Du Bois, 1903
John Dewey, 1927
G. H. Mead, 1908/1930
Karl Mannheim, 1929
Siegfried Kracauer, 1930
Antonio Gramsci, 1930+/-
Walter Benjamin, 1935+/-
Erich Fromm, 1942
Horkheimer & Adorno, 1944
Joseph Schumpeter, 1947
Karl Polanyi, 1944, 1957
David Riesman, 1950
C. Wright Mills, 1956
Roland Barthes, 1957
John K. Galbraith, 1958
Hannah Arendt, 1958
Jürgen Habermas, 1962
Herbert Marcuse, 1964
Michel Foucault, 1969
Paulo Freire, 1970
Pierre Bourdieu, 1970
Fredric Jameson, 1984
MSTU5606-wrap-up

StudyPlace
Categories 
Concepts
Subjects
People
Essays
Reviews
Commons
Courses
Help
Pathways
Concepts
Subjects
People
Essays
Reviews
Commons
Courses
Help

Key tabs
article tab
edit tab
move tab
study tab
history tab
watch tab
  • Robbie McClintock, Instructor
    • Office hours @ 334G Horace Mann, Tuesdays 5:00-6:30 p.m. or by appointment
      (Please email me to schedule a specific time slot)
  • Frank Moretti, Instructor
    • Office hours @ 603 Lewisohn Hall, by appointment (On leave for the Autumn semester)


MSTU5606 • MSTU5607: Fall 2008 and Spring 2009

Readings in Communication theory and social thought is a year-long course, sampling the work of key 20th-century social thinkers.  Each week during the academic year, we will read and discuss the work of an important historical contributor to theories of communication and social life.  A basic schedule for the year is in the MSTU5606 Navigator to the right of your screen.  The dates (9/3 • 1, 9/10 • 2, etc.) link to a more detailed schedule, indicating readings and StudyPlace resources that we will add to and draw on.  Here are some preliminary reflections on the course.

Teachers, academics, artists, journalists, public leaders, intellectuals — educators all — aggregate their work into an encompassing formative ethos, which feeds back upon their efforts, powerfully conditioning them.  This formative ethos, itself massively moving, ever interacting with emergent events, filled with cross-currents and eddies, works on each in unique, determinate ways, setting limits on potentialities, defining a complex ecology of feasible actions.  As participants in this formative ethos, we struggle to build up our capacity to understand and anticipate the changing character of it, to grasp how it affects historical action, personal and public, perhaps even to shape it by an increment towards what we deem to be the better, or away from what we fear to be the worst.  As participants in the formative ethos, we seek to anticipate what knowledge, skills, and values will prove to be of most worth, both for us and others, as the influence of events, foreseen and unforeseen, reverberates through the formative ethos of our time.  We can strengthen our capacity for such anticipation by attending to our predecessors diagnosed the challenge of self-determination within the encompassing formative ethos that they faced.  In this course, we study examples of such efforts in twentieth-century Western experience.

A basic question drives our inquiry.  How does education, understood as an historical component of all human experience, salient in the lives of every person and in the fate of every group, shape human interaction and condition the quality of life?  This is one of the great pedagogical problems, prior to all professional educative efforts.  To come to grips with it, we need to look, not at the norms and actualities of formal education, but at efforts to explain and interpret the ways in which humans give themselves determinate character and capacities in the course of their historical interactions.  We can strengthen our capacities for such an inquiry by contending with the ideas about communication and social action developed by leading thinkers since the late 19th century.  In doing so, we will them engaged primarily in concept formation, Begriffsbildung in German — the fashioning of ideas with which to grasp the structure and meaning of human experience.  Concepts so formed become formative in their turn, allowing people to try to draw new potentialities from the flux of their experience. In reading through our agenda of weekly works, we have the task of developing a clear and thoughtful inventory of the key concepts each writer worked to form.  As a tangible outcome of our work, we should develop conceptual glossaries for each writer that we read as collaborative contributions about each on StudyPlace.

Here are a few tips about how we can best confront each reading.  Each week, we should concentrate on a distinctive text, one that requires sustained, close reading.  In class meetings, we should seek primarily to engage through conversation directly with the text in question, seeking to ground what we have to say by reference to particular words and passages in the text we have in common.  We should not expect the seminar to impart a body of established knowledge that about some historical synthesis of social thought in the 20th century that we deem authoritative.  An appreciation of common themes and concerns should emerge, unique for each participant, but we should not try to read each text as an example of some given context, ticking off which themes and concerns in the context the work reflected, as if the purpose animating it had merely been to illustrate some pre-existent givens.  We strengthen our capacities to construe the context of our lives by seeking to appreciate through the close reading of substantial works how prior authors construed the contexts of their lives. 

In addition, we should not presume that our selection of texts merits attention because it forms an authoritative canon, an optimal foundation for sound theorizing about communications and society in the present.  We select thinkers whose work achieved a challenging intellectual richness, forming concepts that were both deep and broad in relevance to historical experience.  We build our own capacity to form powerful concepts, to engage in Begriffsbildung, by exercising our capacity to engage such work by others.  We simply want to ask what sort of conceptual resources we find in each text, taking it as an autonomous work that we seek to experience in its integrity, as best we can under the constraints.  We, merely human, need to contend with the work as peers of it, for it is the fruit of the merely human.  What can we learn from the work?  What can we do with the concepts formed in it and conveys through it?  Do these help us make sense of our experience of our world?  What do we find surprising in them?  Disturbing?  Confusing?  Inspiring? 

As the texts we read are not authoritative, our reading of them must be tentative and initial.  One week permits only a too-brief encounter.  An expansive intellect samples many works and much experience, returning recurrently with sustained attention to a chosen few of them.  Those constitute a working canon for each of us, deriving its authority from each of us for each of us.  Here we should work more quickly, seriously sampling pssibilities.  For what purpose would I include this work and others by this writer among those to which I think in future I might return?  Of what potentials in my own educational and intellectual options do I find this work exemplary?  What cautionary tales may it offer?  To what degree does the work and the concepts it offers support my interior discourse about the meaning of my world and my potential for action within it?  All these are among the many questions before us.


Meetings

1 • 9/3: Introductory

top

2 • 9/10: Marx & Engels, 1844-1888

top
Study MarxStudy Engels
Discussion reading:
For our class discussion on September 10th, let's concentrate first on the two versions of "Theses on Feuerbach" and then on Manifesto of the Communist Party. We have added in these initial readings from Marx and Engels in an effort to call to mind background from 19th-century social thought that may be useful in subsequent readings. In this respect, the work of Marx and Engels has a two-sided importance — internally it is an important part of the relevant background, and externally it stands as a reminder, and perhaps a conduit, to many other 19th-century contributors to the background relevant to 20th-century social thinkers. With Marx and Engels, we are in a sense alluding to a complex web of influences to which we can be alert in our further readings even though we can never adequately take it into account.

Supplementary:

3 • 9/17: Emile Durkheim, 1893 & 95

top
Study Durkheim
Discussion reading:
  • Emile Durkheim. The Division of Labor in Society (1893). W. D. Halls, trans., New York: The Free Press, 1984. Chapters 1-3, pp. 1-87. Electronic Reserve. $17.95.
  • Emile Durkheim. The Rules of Sociological Method (1895). W. D. Halls, trans., New York: The Free Press, 1982. Chapters I and II, pp. 50-84. Electronic Reserve. $17.95.

4 • 9/24: Ferdinand Tönnies, 1887

top
Study Tönnies
Discussion reading:
  • Ferdinand Tönnies. Community and Civil Society (1887). Jose Harris and Margaret Hollis, trans. (New York: Cambridge University Press 2001). $25.00, especially "Book One: A General Classification of Key Ideas" pp. 15-91, Electronic Reserve.
  • Here is a reading strategy for engaging the text in a relatively limited time. First read the table of contents of the whole book. Then page through the file in five minutes or so to get a sense of what is there. Skip the Preface and read the opening sub-section of "The Argument" (pp. 17-20). Then read sub-sections 1-2, 5-7, 10, 13, and 18 in "The Theory of Gemeinschaft," and sub-sections 19-23, 25, and 35-39 in "The Theory of Gesselschaft," skimming the sub-sections you skip over. It is relevant to think about similarities and differences between Tönnies and Durkheim. It is important to note that they use mechanical and organic in differing ways. It may also be helpful to be aware that Tönnies came from a prosperous peasant family in the farm area just south of Denmark. In addition to high stature among German sociologists, he was a prominent specialist on the work of Thomas Hobbes and his academic career suffered because Prussian governing authorities distrusted his sympathies for Social Democratic actions.
Supplementary reading:
  • Ferdinand Tönnies. Community and Civil Society (1887). Jose Harris and Margaret Hollis, trans. (New York: Cambridge University Press 2001). $25.00, especially "Book Two: Natural Will and Rational Will," pp. 95-175, Electronic Reserve; and Book Three: "The Sociological Basis of Natural Law," pp.179-243, Electronic Reserve.
  • Werner J. Cahnman. "Tönnies and Durkheim," in Cahnman, ed., Ferdinand Tönnies: A New Evaluation -- Essays and Documents. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1973, pp. 239-256. Electronic Reserve.

5 • 10/1: Max Weber, c. 1910

top
Study Weber
Discussion reading:
  • Max Weber. "Basic Sociological Terms" in Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich, eds. (Berkeley: Univeristy of California Press, 1968), Vol. 1, pp. 3-62. Electronic Reserve
    • In reading Weber's discussion of basic sociological terms, let us concentrate on grasping what he means in his description of sociology as "a science concerning itself with the interpretive understanding of social action and thereby with a causal explanation of its course and consequences" (p. 4). What might Weber have understood by science, interpretive understanding, social action, and causal explanation? Is his concern with these and other basic concepts what you would expect or is it a bit surprising to you?
    • Economy and Society is a huge work, posthumous (although largely in a form that Weber gave it). Peruse the "Summary contents" to get a sense of what the whole covers (note that Chapter VI, Religious groups, Chapter VIII, Economy and law, and Chapter XVI, the City, are book-length components). Next I'd page through the whole chapter on basic concepts, to get a sense of its content and structure. Then I would read section 1a and 1b carefully, the first 20 pages or so. The main definitions in the subsequent sections (in regular type) are quite compact, elucidated by numbered remarks (in smaller type). I'd read the definitions and skim (not skip) the remarks in an effort to get a sense of what Weber was trying to grasp through his Begriffsbildung (concept formation), of which all this gives the distilled results. You might wonder which of his concepts were most important for Weber and you might also reflect on whether they still have significant importance for 21st-century inquiry.
Supplementary reading:
  • Max Weber. "Types of Social Action and Groups," Appendix I of Economy and Society (Vol. 2, pp. 1375-1380). Electronic Reserve
  • Max Weber. "The Plebeian City" and "Ancient and Medieval Democracy" in Economy and Society, Vol 2, pp. 1301-1372, esp., 1339-1372. Electronic Reserve
  • See www.zeno.org for Weber's work in German.

6 • 10/8: Georg Simmel, 1903, 1904

top
Study Simmel
Discussion reading:
  • Georg Simmel. "The Web of Group-Affiliations" in Simmel, Conflict and the Web of Group-Affiliations (New York: The Free Press, 1964) pp. 125-195. Electronic Reserve
    • This essay is a good example of the early 20th-century effort at concept formation, seeking to develop conceptual resources for explaining how persons achieved individuality while engaging in many-sided social linkages. Look for similarities and differences with Tönnies and Weber.
  • Georg Simmel. "Fashion" and "The Metropolis and Mental Life" in Simmel, On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings, Donald N. Levine, ed. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press1971), pp. 294-339. Electronic Reserve
    • Simmel published much of his work through essays for a well-educated, general audience, a style represented in these.

7 • 10/15: Building a Course FAQ

top
  • Let's build a FAQ for the course by listing questions and concerns about the reading we have done, and will do, that you have on your mind at this point and developing responses to them. In preparation for our discussion October 15th, list any concern that you would like to clarify on the Course FAQ and we can discuss and develop responses in class.

8 • 10/22: W. E. B. Du Bois, 1903

top
Study Du Bois
Discussion reading:
  • W. E. B. Du Bois. The Souls of Black Folk (1903). (New York: Barnes & Noble Classics, 2003). $5.95. Google Books.

9 • 10/29: John Dewey, 1927

top
Study Dewey
Discussion reading:
  • John Dewey. The Public and Its Problems (1927). (Athens, OH: Swallow Press, 1990). Online Reading: Past Masters. (Login with your Cunix ID and password. click on "Dewey, Collected Works." Expand Dewey's Later Works. The Public and Its Problems is in Vol. 2.) B&N, $13.95.

10 • 11/5: G. H. Mead, 1908/1930

top
Study Mead
Discussion reading:

11 • 11/12: Karl Mannheim, 1929

top
Study Mannheim
Discussion reading:
  • Karl Mannheim. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge (1929). Louis Wirth and Edward Shils, trans., (New York: Harvest Books, 1936). Chapters I, II, and V; pp. 1-108, 264-311. Electronic Reserve. $15.00.

12 • 11/19: Siegfried Kracauer, 1930

top
Study Kracauer
Discussion reading:
  • Siegfried Kracauer. The Salaried Masses (1930). Quintin Hoare, trans. (New York:Verso, 1998). B&N, $15.00.

13 • 12/3: Antonio Gramsci, 1930+/-

top
Study Gramsci
Discussion reading:
  • Antonio Gramsci. The Gramsci Reader: Selected Writings, 1916-1935 (1930+/-). David Forgacs, ed., (New York: New York University Press, 2000). pp. 53-75, 189-245, 300-322, and 363-402. Electronic Reserve. $27.95.

14 • 12/10: Walter Benjamin, 1935+/-

top
Study Benjamin
Discussion reading:
  • Walter Benjamin. Illuminations (1935+/-). Hannah Arendt, ed. (New York: Knopf, 1979). "Introduction" (Hannah Arendt), "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" (1936), and "Theses on the Philosophy of History" (1940); pp. 1-59 and 217-264. Electronic Reserve.$13.50.

15 • 12/17: Erich Fromm, 1942

top
Study Fromm
Discussion reading:
  • Erich Fromm. Escape From Freedom, (AKA in the UK as: The Fear of Freedom) (1942). (New York: Routledge Classics. 2001). Chapters 1 & 2, 4 & 5. Electronic Reserve. B&N, $14.00.
Supplementary reading:
  • Erich Fromm. Escape From Freedom, (AKA in the UK as: The Fear of Freedom) (1942). (New York: Routledge Classics. 2001). Chapters 6 & 7. Electronic Reserve.

16 • 1/21: Horkheimer & Adorno, 1944

top
Study Horkheimer & Study Adorno
Discussion reading:
  • Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (1947). Edmund Jephcott, trans. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002). xi-xix, 1-62, 94-136, 217-252. Electronic Reserve_1, Electronic Reserve_2. $22.95.

17 • 1/28: Joseph Schumpeter, 1947

top
Study Schumpeter
Discussion reading:
  • Joseph A. Schumpeter. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (3rd. edition, 1942, 1947, & 1950). New York: HarperCollins, 1976. Part II. Can Capitalism Survive? Electronic Reserve; Part IV: Socialism and Democracy, Electronic Reserve. $16.00.

18 • 2/4: Karl Polanyi, 1944, 1957

top
Study Polanyi
Discussion reading:
  • Karl Polanyi. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (1944, 1957). 2nd paperback edition with a Foreword by Joseph E. Stiglitz and an Introduction by Fred Block. (Boston: Beacon Press, 2001). Chapters 11-21, pp. 136-268. Electronic Reserve. ACLS Humanities E-Book $22.00.

19 • 2/11: David Riesman, 1950

top
Study Reisman
Discussion reading:
  • David Riesman. The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character (1950, 1969). Abridged and revised edition. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001). pp. 31-108, 163-238. B&N, $17.95.

20 • 2/18: C. Wright Mills, 1956

top
Study Mills
Discussion reading:
  • C. Wright Mills. The Power Elite (1956). (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000). Chapters 1, 5, 6, and 12-15; pp. 3-29, 94-146, and 269-361. Electronic Reserve. $18.95.

21 • 2/25: Roland Barthes, 1957

top
Study Barthes
Discussion reading:
  • Roland Barthes. Mythologies. (1957) Annette Lavers, trans., New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1989. Electronic Reserve. $10.80.

22 • 3/4: John K. Galbraith, 1958

top
Study Galbraith
Discussion reading:

23 • 3/11: Hannah Arendt, 1958

top
Study Arendt
Discussion reading:
  • Hannah Arendt. The Human Condition (1958). 2nd edition. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1998). Prologue, Parts I, II, and VI; pp. 1-78, 248-325. Electronic Reserve. $15.75.

24 • 3/25: Jürgen Habermas, 1962

top
Study Habermas
Discussion reading:
  • Jürgen Habermas. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (1962). Thomas Burger, trans., (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1991). Chapters 16-25 (pp. 141-250) are on electronic reserve. We highly recommend getting the book and reading the whole thing, however.   Online: CU NetLibrary Electronic Reserve.   $27.00.

25 • 4/1: Herbert Marcuse, 1964

top
Study Marcuse
Discussion reading:
  • Herbert Marcuse. One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society (1964). (Boston: Beacon Press, 1991). Chapters 1, 2, and 8-10; pp. 1-55 and 203-257. Electronic Reserve. $14.40.

26 • 4/8: Michel Foucault, 1969

top
Study Foucault
Discussion reading:
  • Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language (1969). (New York: Pantheon, 1982).

27 • 4/15: Paulo Freire, 1970

top
Study Freire
Discussion reading:
  • Paulo Freire. Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1970). New York: Continuum International Publishing, 2000. Electronic Reserve. $15.95.

28 • 4/22: Pierre Bourdieu, 1970

top
Study Bourdieu
Discussion reading:
  • Pierre Bourdieu and Jean Claude Passeron. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture (1970). (Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications Ltd, 1990).

29 • 4/29: Fredric Jameson, 1984

top
Study Jameson
Discussion reading:
  • Fredric Jameson. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (1984). (Durham: Duke University Press, 1991) pp. 1-54, Chapter 1: "The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism." Electronic Reserve. $23.95. Original article: Jameson, "The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism,"The New Left Review, July-August, 1984, pp. 53-92.

30 • 5/6: MSTU5606-wrap-up

top
Talk:MSTU5606/MSTU5607-wrap-up
College Policies on Incompletes

The grade of Incomplete is to be assigned only when the course attendance requirement has been met but, for reasons satisfactory to the instructor, the granting of a final grade has been postponed because certain course assignments are outstanding. If the outstanding assignments are completed within one calendar year from the date of the close of term in which the grade of Incomplete was received and a final grade submitted, the final grade will be recorded on the permanent transcript, replacing the grade of Incomplete, with a transcript notation indicating the date that the grade of Incomplete was replaced by a final grade.

If the outstanding work is not completed within one calendar year from the date of the close of term in which the grade of Incomplete was received, the grade will remain as a permanent Incomplete on the transcript. In such instances, if the course is a required course or part of an approved program of study, students will be required to re-enroll in the course including repayment of all tuition and fee charges for the new registration and satisfactorily complete all course requirements. If the required course is not offered in subsequent terms, the student should speak with the faculty advisor or Program Coordinator about their options for fulfilling the degree requirement. Doctoral students with six or more credits with grades of Incomplete included on their program of study will not be allowed to sit for the certification exam.

top

Americans with Disabilities Act statement

The College will make reasonable accommodations for persons with documented disabilities. Students are encouraged to contact the office of Access and Services for Individuals with Disabilities for information about registration (166 Thorndike Hall). Services are available only to students who are registered and submit appropriate documentation.

top

Personal tools